![]() While ReactOS always feels a bit like chasing an unobtainable goal, I'm still incredibly impressed by their work, and at this point, it does seem like it can serve quite a few basic needs through running actual Win32 applications. Exactly, I have multiple machines running different versions of windows from xp to 10, but I do think that xp (and 7) are in many ways better than later versions, 8 is a joke and 10 is a bit too. WinBtrfs on the other hand came with no such baggage to its history and instead made full use of the documented NT filesystem driver API. Those that the project uses internally have all gone through enough iterations that gaps in ReactOS are worked around. The filesystem stack in ReactOS is arguably one of the less mature components by simple dint of there being so few open source NT filesystem drivers to test against. While the actual filesystem driver itself is from the WinBtrfs project by Mark Harmstone, much of Victor's work was in filling out the bits and pieces of ReactOS that the driver expected to interact with. The work enabling this was part of this year's Google Summer of Code with student developer Victor Perevertkin. The headline feature for 0.4.10 would have to be ReactOS' ability to now boot from a BTRFS formatted drive. em nhac hoa loi viet Reactos 0.3.15 download Fewodirekt usedom Bulldog t. Most of what we are going to talk about is the current situation with releases and overall ReactOS development. n easel tote Mer5770aaw parts Ng-options example array Via marco doggiono. These claims alone will probably ensure no serious commercial entity will ever want to associate itself with ReactOS, and it will be interesting to see if these claims will ever lead to something more serious than mere words. While the ReactOS Twitter account does provide announcements, posts about working applications and such from time to time, much of what is happening with the project as a whole isn’t mentioned. ![]() It is … almost surely impossible that a clean-room reimplementation ends up using macros for the same things, let alone macros with the same or similar names.” Reitschin does add he is no lawyer, but these claims do raise a number of serious concerns and questions about the ReactOS project. ![]() Axel Rietschin, kernel engineer at Microsoft, has claimed that ReactOS, an open source operating system intended to be binary-compatible with Windows, is “a ripoff of the Windows Research Kernel that Microsoft licensed to universities.” He says that “internal data structures and internal functions, not exported anywhere and not part of the public symbols, have the exact same names as they appear in the Research Kernel.” In his recent post, he presents further arguments against ReactOS being a “clean room” implementation done without reference to the source code. Some pretty bold claims by a Microsoft kernel engineer who works on the Windows kernel regarding ReactOS, the open source operating system that aims to be compatible with Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |